Lens and Camera ProfilesĬore to DxO PhotoLab 6 are DxO’s pioneering Optics Modules. That should dramatically accelerate the process.Ĭomparing the two pictures there is a lot more detail in the highlights after Deep Prime XD has been applied. Note that there is a setting in the PL6 Advanced Preferences to enable the GPU on your computer. The processing of the full sized RAW file took nearly 10 minutes on my Mac Mini. This is perhaps the only way to deal with processor intensive task of applying this technology. The original image has no blown highlights and no impenetrable blacks, the detail is there to be retrieved and if you look at the slightly overexposed rocks in top centre, you can see the improvement clearly.Īs in previous versions, the preview window is the only way to view the effect of the correction until you export. I wanted to see how much difference it makes in isolation. DxO Labsīefore doing any other processing I applied DeepPrimeXD to the RAW image in DxO PhotoLab 6. The original DeepPRIME mode is also still on board for faster enhancements or for images that simply need less adjustment. And because it is fundamental to the RAW conversion process, DeepPRIME XD can even increase dynamic range, providing photographers with greater flexibility when shooting in low-light situations. For example, an image shot at 4000 ISO will more closely resemble an image captured at 500 ISO in terms of noise, color, and clarity. Already excellent noise reduction taken a step further.ĭeepPRIME XD uses a neural network trained using billions of image samples and routinely gives photographers improvements of more than 2.5 stops. Because I use Lightroom, I’m going to process my image from the stage of exporting to DxO PhotoLab 6. I’ve selected a fairly dingy RAW file that was a 16 second exposure in a dark canyon near Saleres. These improvements in the tagging capability and usability bring the Library module closer to being perceived as a photo management application and therefore closer to being perceived as a serious rival to Lightroom. It simply builds an index of whatever directory you point it at. The PhotoLab library module is independent of the raw images. The fundamental difference between PhotoLab and Lightroom is that the Lightroom catalogue ingests your photos and arranges them in date ordered directories under the catalogue directory. So what has improved in DxO PhotoLab 6?īuilding on its simple but powerful PhotoLibrary system, DxO PhotoLab 6 extends its range of Exif and IPTC tags, adds nesting for Projects, and introduces color labels for easier organization and management of files DxO Labs The PhotoLibrary has been the achilles heel for PhotoLab for quite a while now, it has been improved incrementally and PhotoLab 5 made a breakthrough in making metadata fields compatible with Adobe Lightroom. However Adobe have the market covered by the sheer breadth of their portfolio so for Luminar, ON1, Capture One and DxO the challenge is to extend the capability of the product while maintaining compatibility with Adobe.ĭxO have addressed this challenge by creating a smooth import/export workflow into the Adobe family – so I can for example keep my photo library in Lightroom, export to PhotoLab for Raw processing and save it seamlessly back into my library. Taking Adobe as the target, and Luminar, ON1 and Capture One as the competition, on RAW processing I think DxO PhotoLab 6 comes out better than anyone. This database comes from their sister company, DxOMark whose business is testing lenses, and provides the industry benchmark for manufacturers. DxO are differentiated from all other vendors by their vast database of lens and body characteristics and their ability to provide corrections for lens/body combinations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |